Explanation:
$\text{K}_\text{max}=\text{h}\upsilon-\phi_0=\frac{\text{hc}}{\lambda}-\phi_0$
$=\frac{(6.6\times10^{-34})\times(3\times10^8)}{(300\times10^{-9})\times(1.6\times10^{-19})}-3.3$
$=4.125\times3.3=0.825\text{eV} $

Explanation:
$\text{K}_\text{max}=\text{h}\upsilon-\phi_0$, when $\upsilon=\upsilon_0,\text{K}_\text{max}=0$
$\therefore0=\text{h}\upsilon_0$ or $\phi_0=\text{h}\upsilon_0$
If $\upsilon<\upsilon_0$, then Kmax is negative, i.e., no photoelectric emission takes place. Thus, graph (c) is possible.

Explanation:
Photoelectric current (i) is proportional to the intensity of the emission light. Thus, graph (a) is possible.
(c) $\phi_1:\phi_2:\phi_3=1:2:4$
Explanation:
From Einstein's photoelectric equation,
$\text{K}_\text{max}=\text{eV}_0=\frac{\text{hc}}{\lambda}-\phi$
or $\text{V}_0=\frac{\text{hc}}{\text{e}}\cdot\frac{1}{\lambda}-\frac{\phi}{\text{e}}$
Graph of V0 versus $\frac{1}{\lambda}$ s a straight line
Slope of straight line, $\tan\theta=\frac{\text{hc}}{\text{e}}$
At V0 = 0, we have
$\phi_1:\phi_2:\phi_3=\frac{\text{hc}}{\lambda_{01}}:\frac{\text{hc}}{\lambda_{02}}:\frac{\text{hc}}{\lambda_{03}}$
$0.001\text{hc}:0.002\text{hc}:0.004\text{hc}$
$\therefore1:2:4$

Explanation:
de-Broglie wavelength
$\lambda=\frac{\text{h}}{\text{P}}\text{i.e.,}\lambda\propto\frac{1}{\text{P}}$
So the graph between $\lambda$ and p is of the type shown is option (d).
Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.

