Question
All pedestrians are devotees.
Some devotees are devotees.
Some devotees are pedestrians.
Some devotees are devotees.
Some devotees are pedestrians.
✓
Answer
The diagram of this constitution is as follows:
Figure: In this constitution, the central term 'devotees' is in place of function in the statement and in the position of purpose in the behalf statement. So this constitution is of the fourth figure.
Differences: In this constitution, the supportive statement is $'A',$ the party statement is $'I'$ and the result is $'I'.$ So the difference of this constitution is $‘AII’.$
Authenticity: There is a lack of moderation in both the supporting statements of this constitution. Thus, in both the Aadhaar statements, the middle position is not covered even once, which leads to the fault of insufficient moderation. So this constitution is dishonest.
Figure: In this constitution, the central term 'devotees' is in place of function in the statement and in the position of purpose in the behalf statement. So this constitution is of the fourth figure.
Differences: In this constitution, the supportive statement is $'A',$ the party statement is $'I'$ and the result is $'I'.$ So the difference of this constitution is $‘AII’.$
Authenticity: There is a lack of moderation in both the supporting statements of this constitution. Thus, in both the Aadhaar statements, the middle position is not covered even once, which leads to the fault of insufficient moderation. So this constitution is dishonest.
Need a full question paper?
Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.
Explore more
Similar questions
(A → B) (~ A v ~ B)
All cosmetics are harmful.
Some charms are not harmful.
Some charms are cosmetics.
Some charms are not harmful.
Some charms are cosmetics.
Prove that the following arguments are standard by constructing metaphorical proof
→| $A \rightarrow B$ |
| $\sim B\ v\ D$ |
| $\sim D$ |
| $\therefore \sim A\ \&\ \sim D$ |
All pilgrimages are sacred.
All temples are holy places.
All temples are places of pilgrimage.
All temples are holy places.
All temples are places of pilgrimage.
Determine the validity of the following arguments using the direct method of truth table:
$A \rightarrow B$
$\therefore B \rightarrow A$
→$A \rightarrow B$
$\therefore B \rightarrow A$
~ (p $\leftrightarrow$ ~ ~ p)
→Complex binary condition statement
All martyrs are patriots.
No traitor is a martyr.
No traitor is a patriot.
No traitor is a martyr.
No traitor is a patriot.
Prove that the following arguments are standard by constructing metaphorical proof
→| $N \ \&\ M$ |
| $\sim S\ (T \ \&\ W)$ |
| $(P \ \&\ R)\ v\ \sim S$ |
| $(N \ \&\ M) \rightarrow \sim (T \ \&\ W)$ |
| $(R \ \&\ N)\ v\ S$ |
Prove that the following arguments are standard by constructing metaphorical proof
→| $H \rightarrow ( I\ \&\ \sim J)$ |
| $( I\ v\ G) \rightarrow K$ |
| $H$ |
| $\sim K\ \&\ I$ |