Guessing in Indian Logic — Philosophy STD 12 Arts — Question
Gujarat BoardEnglish MediumSTD 12 ArtsPhilosophyGuessing in Indian Logic5 Marks
Question
Compare ‘scope with example’ and ‘practicable statement’ in the Panchavayavi estimate.
✓
Answer
There are five statements in the Panchayavi Anuman and three statements in the Nirupadhika Constitution.
If the Panchavayavi conjecture is converted into a non$-$executive constitution and the non$-$executive constitution into a Panchavayavi conjecture, then it will be seen that the place and function of the scope including the example in the Panchavayavi conjecture is the same place and function of the practicable statement in the non$-$executive constitution.
Thus, 'scope' and 'practicable statement' are basically similar, including the example.
Although there are similarities between the scope and the cure, including the example, there are also differences.
The example that is placed with the universal statement in the scope, including the example, should be such that the example can be actually observed.
Therefore, the universal statement and example presented in the scope including the example cannot be imaginary or untrue.
While in the practicable statement no instance can be put that can actually be observed; Because the sadhya statement is presented metaphorically.
Even if it is appropriate in terms of form and untrue or imaginary in terms of form in the non$-$executive constitution, the practicable statement is appropriate in the non$-$executive constitution.
In Indian logic, conjecture is studied by combining both metaphorical and subjective.
While in Western logic, conjecture is studied only from a metaphysical point of view.
Need a full question paper?
Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.