Download App

Flamingo Prose Chapter 2 Lost Spring — ENGLISH CORE STD 12 Science — Question

CBSE BoardEnglish MediumSTD 12 ScienceENGLISH COREFlamingo Prose Chapter 2 Lost Spring5 Marks
Question
Do you believe that ‘God-given lineage can be broken’? Support your position with a rationale.
✓

Answer

The idea of "God-given lineage" implies that a person's social status, opportunities, and destiny are predetermined by their birth in a particular family or community. This notion is often associated with the caste system in India and other hierarchical systems that divide people based on their birth.

From a rational perspective, the notion of breaking God-given lineage is consistent with the principles of social mobility and meritocracy, which are based on the idea that individuals should be judged on their abilities and achievements rather than their social background.

However, the notion of breaking God-given lineage can also be controversial and challenging, particularly in societies where social hierarchies are deeply entrenched and difficult to change. It may be seen as a threat to established power structures and social norms and may face resistance from those who benefit from the status quo.

Need a full question paper?

Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.

Start Generating Free

Explore more

More "Answer The Following Questions. (Flamingo Poem / Prose)(5M)" from Flamingo Prose Chapter 2 Lost Spring→Flamingo Prose Chapter 2 Lost Spring — all question types→ENGLISH CORE STD 12 Science question papers→CBSE Board STD 12 Science question papers→CBSE Board question paper generator→

Similar questions

Umberto Eco, with reference to "The Name of the Rose" says, “I think if I had written The Name of the Rose ten years earlier or ten years later, it wouldn’t have been the same.” What could he have meant?
→
If the world is “nothing but a big rattrap” as the tramp stated in the story ‘The Rattrap’, who might the rattrap peddler be? Discuss.
→
Imagine you are the poet’s friend.

Write a dialogue exchange between yourself and the poet where the latter confides in you about her fears and asks for your advice.
What would your advice be –to face her fears, to ignore them, or something else?
→
  • How would you compare the peddler’s actions in relation to the crofter and Edla?
    Would you say kindness does not always beget kindness, and that the conditions for receiving kindness are important for it to truly transform people? Elaborate.
    Provide relevant textual details to support the analysis.
→
What is the ‘sadness’ that the poet refers to in the poem?
→
Christopher Silvester shares the authors’ reservations about interviewing. Bearing that in mind, would you interview a writer of your choice? If so, what would you pay particular attention to in interviewing the said writer?
→
Let us assume it was Rajendra Prasad who informed Charles Freer Andrews of Gandhi’s decision and the reasons for other leaders’ support of him. Think creatively of how Andrews would have responded and pen down the discussion you think would have taken place between Rajendra Prasad and Andrews.
→
The cry of not having money to do anything except carry on the business of making bangles, not even enough to eat, rings in every home.'

(The Lost Spring)

'...far from the city, we make our roadside stand and ask for some city money to feel in hand'.(A Roadside Stand)

Create a conversation between a bangle maker and the owner of a roadside stand with reference to the above extracts.

You may begin the conversation like this:

Owner of a roadside stand: Your bangles are pretty. Tell me about your experience in this business.
→
Comment on the tone of the poem with references to “My Mother at SixtySix”.
→
Imagine that you overheard the following snippet of an interaction between the valet and the housekeeper at the ironmaster’s mansion at the end of the story.

Speaker 1 - Trust is a difficult choice, which may or may not be rewarded.

 Speaker 2 – Yes, indeed. Ms. Willmansson really believed in that fellow, didn’t she? And he didn’t disappoint. She was so happy reading his letter, oh her tears of joy filled my heart with so much admiration for her. Such a kind, wonderful young lady.

 Speaker 1 – Absolutely. But I wonder, what if that vagabond had run away with the silver spoons? Would you speak so glowingly of Ms. Willmansson then? Our master’s daughter was a bit too gullible. Wouldn’t you say?

 Speaker 2 – But she did what was right. That must count for something. It’s Christmas, and she helped that poor man. It didn’t matter what he did. Surely the choice of right and wrong does not depend on the outcome.

 Speaker 1 – Wouldn’t it? I should jolly well think so.

 How would you respond to the questions raised in this conversation in relation to the story? Write your response in the form of an entry in your daily journal.
→