Question
Explain the failure of wave-theory to explain the photoelectric effect.

Answer

The phenomena of interference, diffraction and polarisation have proved that light has a wave nature. According to this, light is a electromagnetic wave consisting of electric and magnetic fields with continuous distribution of energy over the region of space over which the wave is extended.
According to wave theory the intensity of light is proportional to the square of the amplitude of the light. ( $I \propto A ^2$ )
Thus, the energy of light is directly related to its intensity i.e. light with higher intensity has more energy, therefore, the maximum energy of the emitted electrons is also higher when the high intensity light falls on the metal surface.
Thus, according to wave theory the energy of the photoelectron emitted from the metal depends on the intensity of light, which is the opposite from the experimental result.
According to wave theory if the surface of a metal is exposed to light of sufficient intensity such that the energy received by the electron is greater than the work function of the metal, then electrons will be emitted regardless of the frequency of the light.
This explanation takes out the presence of a threshold frequency inferred from experimental results.
According to wave theory light has a continuous distribution of energy as a wave-front so when light is incident on a metal surface the energy absorbed by the electrons is also continuously absorbed by the wave front of the light.
The number of electrons in a metal is very high, so the energy absorbed by each electron per unit time will be very small.
Thus, the electron will absorb a very small amount of energy from the light every second and when it becomes equal to the work function, the electron will be emitted. A precise calculation shows that it should take hours for the electrons to be emitted.
This explanation is also contrary to the phenomenon of spontaneous emission of electrons found by experimental results.
From this it can be said that the wave theory fails to explain the photoelectric effect.

Need a full question paper?

Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.

Start Generating Free

Similar questions

There are energy bands in a solid. Do we have really continuous energy variation in a band or do we have very closely spaced but still discrete energy levels?
A 12.3 eV electron beam is used to bombard gaseous hydrogen at room temperature. Upto which energy level the hydrogen atoms would be excited?
Calculate the wavelengths of the second member of Lyman series and second member of Balmer series.
A convex lens of focal length 20 cm is placed coaxially with a convex mirror of radius of curvature 20 cm. The two are kept at 15 cm from each other. A point object lies 60 cm in front of the convex lens. Draw a ray diagram to show the formation of the image by the combination. Determine the nature and position of the image formed.
Draw the energy band diagrams (at T > 0K) for n-type and p-type semiconductors. Using diagram, explain why in n-type semiconductor the conduction band has most electrons from the donor impurities.
A small piece of wood is floating on the surface of a 2.5m deep lake. Where does the shadow form on the bottom when the sun is just setting? Refractive index of water $=\frac{4}{3}.$
Can normal force do a nonzero work on an object. If yes, give an example. If no, give reason.
(I) Identify the circuit elements X and Y as shown in the given block diagram and draw the output waveforms of X and Y.

Image

(II) If the centre tapping is shifted towards Diode D1 as shown in the diagram, draw the output waveform of the given circuit.

Image
n-identical cells, each of emf $\varepsilon,$ internal resistance r connected in series are charged by a dc source of emf $\varepsilon'$ using a resistance R.
  1. Draw the circuit arrangement.
  2. Deduce expressions for (a) the charging current and (b) the potential difference across the combination of cells.
When charcoal is prepared from a living tree, it shows a disintegration rate of 15.3 disintegrations of 14C per gram per minute. A sample from an ancient piece of charcoal shows 14C activity to be 12.3 disintegrations per gram per minute. How old is this sample? Half-life of 14C is 5730y.
Two particles, carrying charges -q and +q and having equal masses m each, are fixed at the ends of a light rod of length a to form a dipole. The rod is clamped at an end and is placed in a uniform electric field E with the axis of the dipole along the electric field. The rod is slightly tilted and then released. Neglecting gravity find the time period of small oscillations.