- Explain, why Be2 molecule does not exist by using molecular orbital theory.
- Describe the state of hybridization in PCI5 Why are the axial bonds longer as compared to equatorial bonds?
M.O. configuration of $\text{Be}_2=(\sigma\text{ls})^2(\sigma*\text{ls})^2(\sigma\text{2s})^2(\sigma*2\text{s})$
Bond order of $\text{Be}_2=\frac12(4-4)=0$
Since bond of $\text{Be}_2=\frac{1}{2}(4-4)=0$
$\therefore$ Hydridization in PCl5 is sp3d

Axial bonds experience more electronic repulsion from three equatorial bond pairs and equatorial bonds experience repulsion from only two axial bond pairs hence axial bonds are longer as compared to equatorial bonds.
Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.
$\text{CH}_3-\text{CH}_2-\text{CH}-\text{CH}_3\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \text{OH}$
$\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \text{CH}_3\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |\\\text{CH}_3-\text{C}-\text{CH}_3\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \text{OH}$
$\text{CH}_3-\text{CH}-\text{CH}_2-\text{OH}\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \text{CH}_3$
$\text{CH}_3-\text{CH}_2-\text{O}-\text{CH}_2-\text{CH}_3$
$\text{CH}_3-\text{O}-\text{CH}_2-\text{CH}_2-\text{CH}_3$
$\text{CH}_3-\text{O}-\text{CH}-\text{CH}_3\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \text{CH}_3$
$\text{CH}_3-\text{CH}_2-\text{CH}-\text{CH}_3\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \text{OH}$
$\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \text{CH}_3\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |\\\text{CH}_3-\text{C}-\text{CH}_3\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \text{OH}$
$\text{CH}_3-\text{CH}-\text{CH}_2-\text{OH}\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \text{CH}_3$
$\text{CH}_3-\text{CH}_2-\text{O}-\text{CH}_2-\text{CH}_3$
$\text{CH}_3-\text{O}-\text{CH}_2-\text{CH}_2-\text{CH}_3$
$\text{CH}_3-\text{O}-\text{CH}-\text{CH}_3\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \text{CH}_3$