Question
What do you understand by secularism? Can it be equated with religious tolerance?

Answer

Secularismis:
  1. State has no religion of its own.
  2. No, discrimination among the people on the basis of religion.
  3. Every religion is equal before law.
  4. Every citizen enjoys freedom to reside with freedom and dignity in any part of country.
Equating of secularism with religious tolerance:
  1. Religious tolerance is a powerful base of secularism, i.e. state has positive attitude due to sense of religious tolerance but they do not treat all sects equally.
  2. Secularism provides fundamental rights to minority religious groups within the dominion of state.
  3. The religious tolerance is not a right but a mutual sympathy.
  4. Secularism opposes to intra-religious domination because, if religious tolerance is allowed only, then the people of majority will dominate the people of minority.
  5. Indian secularism emphasizes on peaceful co-existence refer to equal respect towards all religions and their practices and clarity in case of ambiguity.
  6. Under Indian secularism, religiously sanctioned caste-hierarchy are not acceptable.
  7. Though secular state does not have to treat every aspect of every religion with equal respect, but it stops disregard towards the genuine aspects of other sects or religion.

Need a full question paper?

Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.

Start Generating Free

Similar questions

Which of the following do you feel are compatible with the idea of secularism? Give reasons.
  1. Absence of domination of one religious group by another.
  2. Recognition of a state religion.
  3. Equal state support to all religions.
  4. Mandatory prayers in schools.
  5. Allowing separate educational institutions for any minority community.
  6. Appointment of temple management bodies by the government.
  7. Intervention of state to ensure entry of Dalits in temples.
Read the statement by Somnath Lahiri in the Constitutent Assembly quoted in this chapter. Do you agree with him? If yes, give instances to prove it. If not, give arguments against his position.
Peace can be best realised when there is freedom, equality and justice. Do you agree?
Which of the following are involved in the amendment of the Indian Constitution? In what way are they involved?
  1. Voters.
  2. President of India.
  3. State Legislatures.
  4. Parliament.
  5. Governors.
  6. Judiciary.
What is meant by freedom of expression? What in your view would be a reasonable restriction on this freedom? Give examples.
In what way can public interest litigation help the poor?
A former Chief Election Commissioner joined a political party and contested elections. There are various views on this issue. One view is that a former Election Commissioner is an independent citizen and has a right to join any political party and to contest election. According to the other view, leaving this possibility open can affect the impartiality of the Election Commission. So, former Election Commissioners must not be allowed to contest any elections. Which position do you agree with and why?
What are generally considered to be the basic minimum requirements of people for living a healthy and productive life? What is the responsibility of governments in trying to ensure this minimum to all?
What do you understand by the term development? Would all sections of society benefit from such a definition of development?
What is meant by freedom? Is there a relationship between freedom for the individual and freedom for the nation?