Question
Why should ministers have the final say in technical matters?

Answer

  1. In a democracy, the will of the people is supreme.
  2. The minister is elected by the people and is thus, empowered to exercise the will of the people on their behalf.
  3. The minister is finally answerable to the people for all the consequences of the decision taken by him or her. That is why, the minister takes all the final decisions.
  4. The minister decides the overall framework and objectives in which decisions on a policy should be made.
  5. The minister takes the advice of experts on all the technical matters. But very often, experts hold different opinions or place before the minister more than one option. Depending on what the overall objective is, the minister decides.

Need a full question paper?

Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.

Start Generating Free

Similar questions

Who resolved the dispute of the Mandal Commission? How did it materialise later on?
Why was Nelson Mandela freed after 28 years from prison?
Which two categories constitute the executive in a democratic country?
Here are some reports of electoral malpractices from different parts of the world. Is there anything that these countries can learn from India to improve their elections? What would you suggest in each case?
  1. During an election in Nigeria, the officer in charge of counting votes deliberately increased the votes of one candidate and declared him elected. The court later found out that more than five lakh votes cast for one candidate were counted in favour of another.
  2. Just before elections in Fiji, a pamphlet was distributed warning voters that a vote for former Prime Minisiter, Mahendra Chaudhry will lead to bloodshed. This was a threat to voters of Indian origin.
  3. In the US, each state has its own method of voting, its own procedure of counting and its own authority for conducting elections. Authorities in the state of Florida took many controversial decisions that favoured Mr. Bush in the presidential elections in 2000. But no one could change those decisions.
Surekha is an officer in-charge of ensuring free and fair elections in an assembly constituency in a state. Describe what should she focus on for each of the following stages of election:
  1. Election campaign.
  2. Polling day.
  3. Counting day.
What does ‘integration of judiciary’ mean?
How does a person exercise his right to freedom of religion?
‘Despite being a better form of government, democracy does not prove a magical solution for all problems’. Do you agree? Explain with any three arguments.
What is meant by Code of Conduct? How does it exercise its control on party and candidate?
Which of the two Houses of Parliament exercises supreme power and why?