MCQ
$XeF_2$ reacts with $PF_5$ to give
- A$XeF_6$
- ✓$[XeF]^+ [PF_6]^-$
- C$XeF_4$
- D$[PF_4]^+ [XeF_3]^-$
$\left[ XeF _2\right]+\left[ PF _5\right] \rightarrow[ XeF ]^{+}\left[ PF _6\right]^{-}$
Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.
|
LIST $I$ (Compound / Species) |
LIST $II$ (Shape / Geometry) |
| $A$ $\mathrm{SF}_4$ | $I$ Tetrahedral |
| $B$ $\mathrm{BrF}_3$ | $II$ Pyramidal |
| $C$ $\mathrm{BrO}_3^{-}$ | $III$ See saw |
| $D$ $\mathrm{NH}_4^{+}$ | $IV$ Bent $T$-shape |
Choose the correct answer from the options given below :

$I$. Valence bond theory cannot explain the color exhibited by transition metal complexes
$II$. Valence bond theory can predict quantitatively the magnetic properties of transition metal complexes
$III$. Valence bond theory cannot distinguish ligands as weak and strong field ones