MCQ 11 Mark
Assertion (A): de-Broglie wavelength is significant for microscopic particles.
Reason (R): de-Broglie wavelength is inversely proportional to the mass of a particle when velocity is kept constant.
Reason (R): de-Broglie wavelength is inversely proportional to the mass of a particle when velocity is kept constant.
- ABoth A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
- BBoth A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
- CA is true but R is false.
- DA is false but R is true.
Answer
View full question & answer→(a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
Explanation: de-Broglie wavelength, $\lambda=\frac{h}{m v}$
h and v remaining constant, $\lambda \propto \frac{1}{m}$
So, as the mass of the particle becomes smaller and smaller the de-Broglie wavelength of the particle becomes more and more significant.
Hence, assertion and reason both are true and reason explains the assertion properly.
Explanation: de-Broglie wavelength, $\lambda=\frac{h}{m v}$
h and v remaining constant, $\lambda \propto \frac{1}{m}$
So, as the mass of the particle becomes smaller and smaller the de-Broglie wavelength of the particle becomes more and more significant.
Hence, assertion and reason both are true and reason explains the assertion properly.