Constitution as a Living Documents Political Science - Constitution as a Living Documents

Identify the correct statements about the theory of basic structure. Correct the incorrect statements.This theory found its first expression in the Kesavananda Bharati case and has been discussed in subsequent judgments.

Identify the correct statements about the theory of basic structure. Correct the incorrect statements.This theory has increased the powers of the judiciary and has come to be accepted by different political parties and the government.

Write True/ False against the following statements
The Judiciary cannot initiate the process of constitutional amendment but can effectively change the Constitution by interpreting it differently.

Identify the correct statements about the theory of basic structure. Correct the incorrect statements.Legislature can amend all parts of the Constitution except the basic structure.

You have read in this chapter that the 42 and amendment was one of the most controversial amendments so far.Which of the following were the reasons for this controversy?

1. It was made during national emergency, and the declaration of that emergency was itself controversial.
2. It was made without the support of special majority.
3. It was made without ratification by State legislatures.
4. It contained provisions, which were controversial.

Explain the reason for requiring special majority for amending the Constitution.

If amending power is with the elected representatives, judiciary should NOT have the power to decide the validity of amendments. Do you agree? Give your reasons in 100 words.

Which of the following are involved in the amendment of the Indian Constitution? In what way are they involved?

1. Voters.
2. President of India.
3. State Legislatures.
4. Parliament.
5. Governors.
6. Judiciary.

Many amendments to the Constitution of India have been made due to different interpretations upheld by the Judiciary and the Parliament. Explain with examples.

Which of the following is not a reasonable explanation of the conflict between the legislature and the judiciary over different amendments?

1. Different interpretations of the Constitution are possible.
2. In a democracy, debates and differences are natural.
3. Constitution has given higher importance to certain rules and principles and also allowed for amendment by special majority.
4. Legislature cannot be entrusted to protect the rights of the citizens.
5. Judiciary can only decide the constitutionality of a particular law; cannot resolve political debates about its need.