Question
Compare and contrast the changes in India with the pattern that was observed for developed countries. What kind of changes between sectors were desired but did not happen in India?Table 8: Percentage Share of Sector-wise Contribution of GDP
CountryGross domestic product $ billionsAgriculture % of GDPIndustry % of GDPManufacturing % of GDPServices
% of GDP
2000201520002015200020152000201520002015
China1,211.3011,007.70159464132304050
India476.62,095.402317263015165153
Germany1,950.003,363.4011313023236869
Japan4,731.204,123.3021312721196772
UK1,635.402,858.0011251915107480
USA10,284.8018,036.6011232116127678
World33,391.0073,891.9054312819156468

Answer

In case of developed countries, the evolution of the economy happened in the most logical
pattern. Growth in the primary sector was followed by a growth in the secondary sector.
After that, the growth of the tertiary sector followed. The employment generation also kept
pace with related changes in different sectors.
The case of India is somewhat different. Both the Secondary and Tertiary sectors are
increasing at the expense of the Primary sector, but the increase in Tertiary sector is more.
The growth of the primary sector was not followed by the growth of the secondary sector,
rather it was the tertiary sector which took the lead. But employment generation in either
the secondary or tertiary sector could not keep pace. For India, to become a strong
industrialised nation, the Secondary sector should have increased more but this is not
happening due to a variety of reasons.

Need a full question paper?

Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.

Start Generating Free