Question
Differentiate between Self Reliance and Self Sufficiency.

Answer

Difference between Self reliance and Self Sufficiency can be summarised as below:
  1. An economy must have enough resources or foreign exchange to purchase all inputs required for production, if they are not available within the country. If it has enough resources to buy these resources it is said to be self-reliant. On the contrary, when a country can produce everything within its domestic territory, it is said to be self-sufficient.
  2. It is possible to be self-reliant but it is not possible for an economy to be self sufficient.
  3. Self-sufficiency is also not desirable economically because it may be cheaper and better to buy certain inputs from other countries. For that a country needs foreign exchange. If a country has foreign exchange, it is self-reliant.

Need a full question paper?

Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.

Start Generating Free

Similar questions

Economists and scholars have identified certain key issues that are associated with rural development.
Write the name of some key issues.
What will happen if there is no additional employment generated in the economy even though economy is able to produce goods and services in the economy? How will jobless growth happen?
How are mini-hydel plants environment friendly?
What is meant by environment?
Why is P.C. Mahalanobis known as the architect of Indian planning?
What role does the government play in generating employment opportunities?
Government had allocated ₹ 42 crore for the upliftment of Pahadi Korwas, a tribal community. Under this project, a road was developed in the Kach Ketha village costing ₹ 17.44 lakh. However, the officials failed to notice that there was only one Korwa family in that village and they were suffering from acute water shortage. Also, these funds were grossly misappropriated as only 'Lal Mitti' was put over a Kutcha road. As Ramdas says, "Instead of spending ₹ 17.44 lakh of that road, if they had spent a few thousands on improving the damaged well on my land, wouldn't that have been better?"
  1. What according to you would have truly benefitted Ramdas Korwa-developing the road or improving the well?
  2. ₹ 17.44 lakh were spent on developing the road. Is this cost justified?
  3. What values do you find disturbing in the above case?
Write a brief note on International Monetary Fund (IMF). Also state its objectives.
How has the supply-demand relationship led to degradation of environment?
Why are children not included in working population?