Question
Give the negative effects of the British rule in India.

Answer

The negative effects of the British rule in India are as follows:
  1. Colonial exploitation through trade malpractices: The Britishers exploited India by following the given trade practices:
  1. They collected raw material for British industries from India.
  2. They sold finished goods of British industries in India. To encourage the above trade, no duty was charged on imports from Britain and subsidy was given for exporting raw material to Britain.
  1. Use of British capital to exploit country's resources: The Britishers used their capital and entrepreneurial skills to exploit India's natural resources and cheap labour resources. The Britishers invested in mining and plantation industries and paid very low wages to the workers inspite of unsafe working conditions.
  2. Development of industries which complemented the British industries: The Britishers invested only in those industries which complemented the growth of their industries back home. So, they invested in developing railways, post and telegraphs, rubber, tea and coffee plantations, etc. They totally neglected the development of key and basic industries like iron and steel, machine making industries, etc. Jute and cotton textile industries, were also discouraged as they could have been a threat for the textile factories of Britain.
  3. Economic drain: The Britishers drained the country economically. They took away various wealthy possessions that India possessed, e.g., the famous Kohinoor diamond. According to an estimate, approximately a trillion dollars were looted by the Britishers, in addition to the gems and jewels.
  4. Partition of the country: This was the most diastatic consequence of the British rule in India; the effects of which we still face in the form of cross-border terrorism. The Britishers fuelled the Hindu-Muslim dispute for their own benefit, which led to the partition of the country.

Need a full question paper?

Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.

Start Generating Free

Similar questions

These days the private health sector has grown by leaps and bounds. Do you agree? Justify the statement.
Economists say that if casualisation increases the earning of the people, then such phenomenon should be welcomed. Suppose a marginal farmer becomes a full-time agricultural labourer do you think he will be happy even if he earns more in his daily wage work? Or will a permanent and regular worker of the pharmaceutical industry be happy if he becomes a daily wage labourer, even if his overall earnings increase? Discuss.
Match the following:
1.
Prime Minister
A.
Seeds that give large proportion of output.
2.
Gross Domestic Product
B.
Quantity of goods that can be imported.
3.
Quota
C.
Chairperson of the planning commission.
4.
Land Reforms
D.
The money value of all the final goods and services produced within the economy in one year.
5.
HYV Seeds
E.
Improvements in the field of agriculture to increase its productivity.
6.
Subsidy
F.
The monetary assistance given by government for production activities.
  1. Name atleast six parameters of Human Development.
  2. Explain atleast three areas where India and Pakistan both have achieved success.
What do you mean by unemployment? What types of unemployment are found in rural and urban areas of India? Briefly explain.
What are the indicators of educational achievement in a country?
How will you know whether a worker is working in the informal sector?
In your view, is it essential for the government to regulate the fee structure in education and health care institutions? If so, why?
Discuss some of the institutional weaknesses in Indian agriculture.
Give an account of human capital of India.