It is preferable to measure the $e.m.f.$ of a cell by potentiometer than by a voltmeter because of the following possible reasons.
$(i)$ In case of potentiometer, no current flows through the cell.
$(ii)$ The length of the potentiometer allows greater precision.
$(iii)$ Measurement by the potentiometer is quicker.
$(iv)$ The sensitivity of the galvanometer, when using a potentiometer is not relevant.
Which of these reasons are correct?
A$(i), (iii), (iv)$
B$(i), (iii), (iv)$
C$(i), (ii)$
D$(i), (ii), (iii), (iv)$
AIEEE 2012, Diffcult
Download our app for free and get started
C$(i), (ii)$
c To measure the emf of a cell we prefer potentiometer rather than voltmeter because
$(i)$ the length of potentiometer which allows greater precision.
$(ii)$ in case of potentiometer, no current flows through the cell.
$(iii)$ of high sensitivity
Download our app
and get started for free
Experience the future of education. Simply download our apps or reach out to us for more information. Let's shape the future of learning together!No signup needed.*
In order to measure the internal resistance $r_1$ of a cell of emf $E$, a meter bridge of wire resistance $R_0=50 \Omega$, a resistance $R_0 / 2$, another cell of emf $E / 2$ (internal resistance $r$ ) and a galvanometer $G$ are used in a circuit, as shown in the figure. If the null point is found at $l=72 cm$, then the value of $r_1=$ . . . . $\Omega$
Six similar bulbs are connected as shown in the figure with a $DC$ source of $emf\; E$, and zero internal resistance. The ratio of power consumption by the bulbs when $(i)$ all are glowing and $(ii)$ in the situation when two from section $A$ and one from section $B$ are glowing, will be
A galvanometer together with an unknown resistance in series is connected to two identical batteries each of $1.5\, V$. When the batteries are connected in series, the galvanometer records a current of $1\,A$, and when batteries are in parallel the current is $0.6\,A$. What is the internal resistance of the battery ?
Consider a metallic cube of edge length $L$. Its resistance, $R$, measured across its opposite faces is $R =\frac{ m _{ e } v }{ ne ^2 L ^2}$, where $n$ is the number density and $v$ is the drift speed of electrons in the cube, and $e$ and $m _{ e }$ are the charge and mass of an electron respectively. Assuming the de-Broglie wavelength of the electron to be $L$, the maximum resistance of the sample is closest to ............. $\,\Omega$ $\left(e=1.60 \times 10^{-19} \,C ; m _{ e }=9.11 \times 10^{-31} \,kg\right.$; Planck's constant, $h=6.63 \times 10^{-34} \,Js$ )
In the given figure, there is a circuit of potentiometer of length $A B=10 \,{m}$. The resistance per unit length is $0.1 \,\Omega$ per ${cm}$. Across ${AB}$, a battery of emf ${E}$ and internal resistance ' ${r}^{\prime}$ is connected. The maximum value of emf measured by this potentiometer is : (In $V$)