Question
Without using truth table, show that : (p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)

Answer

LHS = (p ∨ q) → r
≡ ~(p → q) ∨ r ……..(Conditional Law)
≡ (~p ∧ ~q) ∨ r ……….(De Morgan’s Law)
≡ (~p ∨ r) ∧ (~q ∨ r) ………..(Distributive Law)
≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r) …….(Conditional Law)
= RHS.

Need a full question paper?

Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.

Start Generating Free