
$\Rightarrow(\text{Z}-\text{b})^2=\frac{\text{v}}{\text{a}^2}$
This is the equation of a parabola with some intercept on the axis, representing atomic number (Z). Hence, curve d represent this relation correctly.21 questions · self-marked practice — reveal the answer and mark yourself.

$\Rightarrow(\text{Z}-\text{b})^2=\frac{\text{v}}{\text{a}^2}$
This is the equation of a parabola with some intercept on the axis, representing atomic number (Z). Hence, curve d represent this relation correctly.Explanation:
The X-ray beam emerging from an X-ray tube consists of wavelengths greater than a certain minimum wavelength called cutoff wavelength.
Explanation:
As we increase the accelerating potential between the filament and the target, the penetrating power of the X-ray will increase. As a result, the fraction of the X-ray passing through the foil will increase. But it is given that the same fraction of the X-ray is passing. Therefore, the thickness of the aluminium foil should be increased to maintain the same fraction of the X-ray that will pass through the foil.
Explanation:
Radius of the diffraction disc is directly proportional to the wavelength of the light used for the given hole. We know that the wavelength of an X-ray is less than the wavelength of visible light. If an X-ray is passed through the same setup, the radius of the diffraction disc will be less than 0.1m.
Explanation:
Cutoff wavelength (minimum) is absent in the X-rays coming from a Coolidge tube. Hence, the 25 pm wavelength is absent.
Explanation:
Cutoff wavelength (λmin) is given by
$\lambda_{\text{min}}=\frac{\text{hc}}{\text{eV}}$
Here,
h = Planck's constant
c = Speed of light
V = Accelerating voltage
e = Charge of electron
Clearly, a cutoff wavelength depends on accelerating voltage. It does not depend on the target material, separation between the target and the temperature of the filament.
Explanation:
An X-ray exerts force on the material on which it is incident. For example, it can penetrate into metals. An X-ray also transfers energy, momentum and impulse to the material on which it incident. Therefore, all options are correct.
Explanation:
The penetrating power of X-rays varies directly with the accelerating potential of the electrons (V) or the energy of the X-rays. So, if the potential difference between the target and the filament is increased, the fraction of the X-rays passing through the foil will also increase.
Explanation:
Let $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ be the wavelengths of the photons of continuous and characteristic X-rays, respectively.
Given:
$\lambda_1=\lambda_2=\lambda$
Now, frequency $(\nu)$ is given by
$\nu=\frac{\text{c}}{\lambda_1}=\frac{\text{c}}{\lambda_2}$
$\Rightarrow\nu=\frac{\text{c}}{\lambda}$
Hence, the frequency of both the photons is the same.
Energy of a photon (E) is given by
$\text{E}=\text{h}\nu$
As the frequency of both the photons is the same, they will have the same energy.
The photon of the continuous X-ray and the photon of the characteristic X-ray consist of the same penetrating power.
The photon of the characteristic X-ray is created because of the transition of an electron from one shell to another. The photon of the continuous X-ray is created because of the conversion of the kinetic energy of an electron into a photon of electromagnetic radiation.
Explantion:
We know that the intensity of an X-ray is directly proportional to the current through the X-ray tube. If the filament current is increased to increase the temperature of the filament, more electrons will be emitted from the filament per unit time. As a result, current in the X-ray tube will increase and consequently, the intensity of the X-ray will also increase.
Explanation:
It is clear from the figure that the X-ray of tube A has less cutoff wavelength than the X-ray of tube B.
$\therefore\lambda_\text{A}<\lambda_\text{B}$
Using Moseley's Law,
ZA < ZB
$\lambda\propto\frac{1}{\text{V}}$, where V is the voltage applied in the X-ray tube.
$\therefore$ VA > VB
Explanation:
In an X-ray tube, electrons are emitted by the filament when it is heated. An electric field generated by a DC battery between the filament and the target makes the electrons hit the target atoms with a very high speed. As a result, the electrons lose their kinetic energy to eject photons, which leads to a continuous emission of X-rays.
Explanation:
Harder X-rays are the X-rays having low wavelengths. Since the frequency varies inversely with the wavelength, hard X-rays have high frequency.
Energy of a photon (E) is given by
$\text{E}=\frac{\text{hc}}{\lambda}$
Here,
h = Planck's constant
c = Speed of light
$\lambda$ = Wavelength of light.
Clearly, energy varies inversely with wavelength. Therefore, the energy of the photon will be higher for the hard X-ray.
Explanation:
Since X-rays do not have any charged particles, they are not deflected by an electric field or a magnetic field.
$\lambda(\text{K}_\alpha)>\lambda(\text{K}_\beta)>\lambda(\text{K}_\gamma)$
$\lambda(\text{M}_\alpha)>\lambda(\text{K}_\beta)>\lambda(\text{K}_\alpha)$
Explanation:
The
$\text{K}_\gamma$ transition (from the N shell to the K shell) involves more energy than the $\text{K}_\beta$ transition (from the M shell to the K shell), which has more energy than the $\text{K}_\alpha$ transition (from the L shell to the K shell).As the energy varies inversely with the wavelength,
$\lambda(\text{K}_\alpha)>\lambda(\text{K}_\beta)>\lambda(\text{K}_\gamma)$
The $\text{M}_\alpha$ transition is due to the jumping of an electron from the N shell to the M shell and involves less energy than the $ \text{L}_\alpha$ transition (from the M shell to the L shell), which involves less energy than the $\text{K}_\alpha$ transition (from the L shell to the K shell).
As the energy varies inversely with the wavelength,
$\lambda(\text{M}_\alpha)>\lambda(\text{L}_\alpha)>\lambda(\text{K}_\alpha)$
Explanation:
In an X-ray tube, electrons are emitted by the filament. These electrons are made to strike the filament by applying an electric field between the filament and the target. As a result of it, the kinetic energy of the electrons is lost to the target atoms. This energy is utilised by the target atoms to knock out an electron from the innermost shell. Consequently, the electron makes a transition from the higher energy state to this vacant shell. Due to this transition, the difference of energy of the two states gives photon of characteristic X-ray.
Explanation:
Cutoff wavelength $(\lambda_\text{min})$ is given by
$\lambda_\text{min}=\frac{\text{hc}}{\text{eV}}$
Here,
h = Planck's constant
c = Speed of light
V = Accelerating voltage
e = Charge of electron
If the potential difference applied to an X-ray tube (V) is increased, then the minimum wavelength (cutoff wavelength) gets decreased.
Intensity is not affected by the potential difference applied.
Explanation:
Energy of a vacant atom is higher than that of a neutral atom.
Hence, option (a) is incorrect.
K X-ray is emitted when an electron makes a jump to the K shell from some other shell. As a result, a positive charge hole is created in the outer shell. As the electron continuously moves to the K shell, the hole moves from the K shell to some other shell.
Hence, option (b) is correct.
K X-ray is emitted due to the transition of an electron from the L or M shell to the K shell and L X-ray is emitted due to the transition of an electron from the M or N shell to the L shell. The energy involved in the transition from the L or M shell to the K shell is higher than the energy involved in the transition from the M or N shell to the L shell. Since the energy is inversely proportional to the wavelength, the wavelength of the K X-ray is smaller than the wavelength of the L X-ray of the same material. Hence, option (c) is correct.
If EK, EL and EM are the energies of K, L and M shells, respectively, then the wavelength of $\text{K}_\alpha$ X-ray $(\lambda_1)$ is given by
$\lambda_1=\frac{\text{hc}}{\text{E}_\text{K}-\text{E}_\text{L}}$
Here,
h = Planck's constant
c = Speed of light
Wavelength of the $\text{K}_\beta$ x-ray $(\lambda_2)$ is given by
$\lambda_2=\frac{\text{hc}}{\text{E}_\text{K}-\text{E}_\text{M}}$
As the difference of energies (EK - EM) is more than (EK - EL), $\lambda_2$ is less than $\lambda_1$.
Hence, option (d) is not correct.
Explanation:
When an electron strikes the target in a Coolidge tube, the kinetic energy of the electron is used in two ways. Some part of the kinetic energy is converted into a photon, while the remaining part gets converted into heat when the electron makes collisions with the atoms of the target. However, the amount of kinetic energy appearing as the photon vary from collision to collision.
Explanation:
Cut off wavelength is given by
$\lambda_{\text{min}}=\frac{\text{hc}}{\text{eV}'}$
where h = Planck's constan
c = speed of light
e = charge on an electron
V = potential difference applied to the tube
When potential difference (V) applied to the tube is doubled, cutoff wavelength
$\big({\lambda}'_\text{min}\big)$ is given by
${\lambda}'_\text{min}=\frac{\text{hc}}{\text{e}(2\text{V})}$
$\Rightarrow\lambda'_\text{min}=\frac{\lambda_\text{min}}{2}$
Cuttoff wavelength does not depend on the separation between the filament and the target.
Thus, cutoff wavelength will be halved if the the potential difference applied to the tube is doubled.
Explanation:
Cut off wavelength is given by
$\lambda_\text{min}=\frac{\text{hc}}{\text{eV}'}$
where h = Planck's constant
c = speed of light
e = charge on an electron
V = potential difference applied to the tube
Clearly, the cutoff wavelength does not depend on the current in the circuit and temperature of the filament.