Explanation:
Given $\text{I}_1=\text{10 }\frac{\text{W}}{\text{m}^2}$ and $\text{I}_2=\text{25 }\frac{\text{W}}{\text{m}^2}$
$\frac{\text{I}_1}{\text{I}_2}=\frac{\text{a}^2_1}{\text{a}^2_2}=\frac{10}{25}\Rightarrow\frac{\text{a}_1}{\text{a}_2}=\frac{3.16}{5}$ or
$\text{a}_1=\frac{3.16}{5}\text{a}_2=0.6324\text{a}_2$
$\frac{\text{I}_\text{max}}{\text{I}_\text{min}}=\frac{(\text{a}_1+\text{a}_2)^2}{(\text{a}_1-\text{a}_2)^2}=\frac{[0.6324\text{a}_2+\text{a}_2]^2}{[0.6324\text{a}_2-\text{a}_2]^2}=19.724$
Explanation:
In an excessively thin film, the thickness of the film is negligible. Thus the path difference between the reflected rays becomes $\frac{\lambda}{2}$ which produces a minima.
Explanation:
Since, $\beta=\frac{\lambda\text{D}}{\text{d}}$ for d = 2d,
$\beta'=\frac{\lambda\text{D}'}{2\text{d}}=\beta$ (Gives)
$\therefore$ D1 = 2D
Explanation:
The condition for possible interference maxima on the screen is, $\text{d}\sin\theta=\text{n}\lambda$
where d is slit separation and $\lambda$ is the wavelength.
As $\text{d}=2\lambda$ (given) $\therefore2\lambda\sin\theta=\text{n}\lambda$ or $2\sin\theta=\text{n}$
For number of interference maxima to be maximum,
$\sin\theta=1\ \ \ \therefore\ \ \ \text{n}=2$
The interference maxima will be formed when
$\text{n}=0,\pm1,\pm2$
Hence the maximum number of possible maxima is 5.
(d) $\sqrt3\text{a}$
Explanation:
$\text{y}_1=\text{a}\sin\Big(\omega\text{t}\frac{\pi}{3}\Big)$ and $\text{y}_2=\text{a}\sin\omega\text{t}$
$\text{A}=\sqrt{\text{a}_1^2+\text{a}^2_2+2\text{a}_1\text{a}_2\cos\phi}$, where $\phi=\frac{\pi}{3}$
$=\sqrt{\text{a}^2+\text{a}^2+2\text{aa}\cos\frac{\pi}{3}}=\sqrt3\text{a}$
Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.

