Questions · Page 1 of 2

3 Marks Question

🎯

Test yourself on this topic

50 questions · timed · auto-graded

Question 13 Marks
  1. Drive the expression for electric field at a point on the equatorial line of an electric dipole.
  2. Depict the orientation of the dipole in (i) stable, (ii) unstable equilibrium in a uniform electric field.
View full question & answer
Question 23 Marks
A polythene piece rubbed with wool is found to have a negative charge of 3 × 10-7 C.
  1. Estimate the number of electrons transferred (from which to which?)
  2. Is there a transfer of mass from wool to polythene?
View full question & answer
Question 33 Marks
Consider a uniform electric field E = 3 × 103 î N/C.
  1. What is the flux of this field through a square of 10 cm on a side whose plane is parallel to the yz plane?
  2. What is the flux through the same square if the normal to its plane makes a 60° angle with the x-axis?
View full question & answer
Question 43 Marks
A point charge of 2.0 μC is at the centre of a cubic Gaussian surface 9.0 cm on edge. What is the net electric flux through the surface?
View full question & answer
Question 53 Marks
Figure 1.33 shows tracks of three charged particles in a uniform electrostatic field. Give the signs of the three charges. Which particle has the highest charge to mass ratio?

View full question & answer
Question 63 Marks
A conducting sphere of radius 10 cm has an unknown charge. If the electric field 20 cm from the centre of the sphere is 1.5 × 103 N/C and points radially inward, what is the net charge on the sphere?
View full question & answer
Question 73 Marks
What is the force between two small charged spheres having charges of 2 × 10-7C and 3 × 10-7C placed 30cm apart in air?
View full question & answer
Question 83 Marks
Two large, thin metal plates are parallel and close to each other. On their inner faces, the plates have surface charge densities of opposite signs and of magnitude 17.0 × 10–22 C/m2 . What is E:
  1. In the outer region of the first plate,
  2. In the outer region of the second plate, and
  3. Between the plates?
Answer
Given,

Surface charge density, $\sigma$ = 17. 0 x 10-22 C /m2

  1. To the left of the plates, electric fields are equal and opposite as plates are close to each other electric field is zero as surface charge density in outer side is zero.
  2. To the right of the plates, electric fields are equal and opposite as plates are close to each other electric field is zero.
  3. Electric fields between the plates are in same direction as total E.F. on both sides of plate due to $\sigma$ surface charge density = $\frac{\sigma}{\in_0}$ electric field of inner side of plate =$\frac{\sigma}{2\in_0}$

and for both plate E $=\frac{\sigma}{2\in_0}+\frac{\sigma}{2\in_0}$

$\text{E}=\frac{\sigma}{\in_0}=\sigma\times4\pi\times9\times10^9$

E = 17.0 × 10-22 × 4 × 3.14 × 9 × 109

E = 1921.7 × 10-13

= 1.92 × 10-10 N/C.

View full question & answer
Question 93 Marks
A hollow charged conductor has a tiny hole cut into its surface. Show that the electric field in the hole is (σ/2ε0) $\hat{\text{n}}$ , where $\hat{\text{n}}$ is the unit vector in the outward normal direction, and σ is the surface charge density near the hole.
Answer
Let us take a charged conductor with the hole filled up, as shown by shaded portion in the figure.

We find with the application of Gaussian theorem that field inside is zero and just outside is $\frac{\sigma}{\in_0}\hat{\text{n}}.$
This field can be viewed as the superposition of the field E2 due to the filled up hole plus the field E1 due to the rest of the charged conductor.
The two fields (E1 and E2) must be equal and opposite as the field vanishes inside the conductor. Thus, E1 - E2 = 0
Now, the field outside the conductor is given by
$\text{E}_1+\text{E}_2=\frac{\sigma}{\in_0}$
$\therefore \ 2\ \text{E}_1=\frac{\sigma}{\in_0}$
$\Rightarrow\ \text{E}_1=\frac{\sigma}{2\in_0}$
Therefore, field in the hole (due to the rest of the conductor) is given as:
$\text{E}_1=\frac{\sigma}{2\in_0}\hat{\text{n}}$ ($\hat{\text{n}}$ → unit vector in the outward normal direction)
View full question & answer
Question 103 Marks
Obtain the formula for the electric field due to a long thin wire of uniform linear charge density λ without using Gauss’s law.
[Hint: Use Coulomb’s law directly and evaluate the necessary integral.]
Answer
Consider a long thin wire of uniform linear charge density, $\lambda$.
To find: Formula for electric field due to this wire at any point P at a perpendicular distance PC= r from the wire.
Consider a small element of length dx of the wire with centre O, such that OC = x.
Charge on the element, q = $\lambda$. dx

So, electric intensity at P due to the element is given by,
$\text{dE}=\frac{1}{4\pi\in_0}\frac{\lambda\text{dx}}{\text{OP}^2}=\frac{\lambda.\text{dx}}{4\pi\in_0(\text{r}^2+\text{x}^2)}$
Now, $\text{d}\vec{\text{E}}$ can be resolved into two rectangular components, that is $\text{d}\vec{\text{E}}$ $\cos\theta$ in a perpendicular direction and $\text{d}\vec{\text{E}}$ $\sin\theta$ in a parallel direction.
The parallel component will be cancelled by the parallel component of the field due to charge on a similar element dx of wire on the other half.
The radial components get added.
Therefore,
Effective component of electric intensity due to the charge element, dE' = $\text{d}\vec{\text{E}}\cos\theta$
$\text{dE}' = \frac{\lambda.\text{dx}\cos\theta}{4\pi\in_0(\text{r}^2+\text{x}^2)} \dots\dots(1)$
From $\triangle$ OCP, x = r tan $\theta$
$\therefore\text{dx}=\text{r}\sec^2\theta\ \text{d}\theta$
$\text{Now}, \text{r}^2+\text{x}^2=\text{r}^2+\text{r}^2\tan^2\theta=\text{r}^2(1+\tan^2\theta)$
From equation (1), we have
$\text{dE}'=\frac{\lambda\text{r}\sec^2\theta\ \text{d}\theta}{4\pi\in\text{r}^2\sec^2\theta}\cos\theta$
$\Rightarrow\text{dE}' = \frac{\lambda}{4\pi\in_0\text{r}}\cos\theta\ \text{d}\theta$
Since the wire has infinite length, it's ends A and B are infinite distances apart.
Therefore, $\theta$ varies from $-\frac{\pi}{2}\text{to}+\frac{\pi}{2}$
So, Electric Intensity at P due to the whole wire is given by,
$\text{E}'=\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{+\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\lambda}{4\pi\in_0\text{r}}\cos\theta\ \text{d}\theta$
$=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\in_0\text{r}},$ is the required electric field intensity.
View full question & answer
Question 113 Marks
Suppose the spheres A and B in Exercise 1.12 have identical sizes. A third sphere of the same size but uncharged is brought in contact with the first, then brought in contact with the second, and finally removed from both. What is the new force of repulsion between A and B?
Answer
Distance between the spheres, A and B, r = 0.5 m
Initially, the charge on each sphere, q = 6.5 x 10-7 C
When sphere A is touched with an uncharged sphere C, $\frac{\text{q}}{2}$ amount of charge from A  will transfer to sphere C. Hence, charge on each of the spheres, A and C, is $\frac{\text{q}}{2}$.
When sphere C with charge $\frac{\text{q}}{2}$ is brought in contact with sphere B with charge q, total charges on the system will divide into two equal halves given as,
$\frac{\frac{\text{q}}{2}+\text{q}}{2}=\frac{3\text{q}}{4}$
Each sphere will share each half. Hence, charge on each of the spheres, C and B, is $\frac{3\text{q}}{4}.$
Force of repulsion between sphere A having charge $\frac{\text{q}}{2}$ and sphere B having charge
$\frac{3\text{q}}{4}=\frac{\frac{\text{q}}{2}\times\frac{3\text{q}}{4}}{4\pi\in_0\text{r}^2}=\frac{3\text{q}^2}{8\times4\pi\in_0\text{r}^2}$
$=9\times10^9\times\frac{3\times(6.5\times 10^{-7})^2}{8\times(0.5)^2}$
= 5.703 × 10-3 N
Therefore, the force of attraction between the two spheres is 5.703 x 10-3 N.
View full question & answer
Question 123 Marks
A point charge +10 μC is a distance 5cm directly above the centre of a square of side 10cm, as shown in Fig. 1.34. What is the magnitude of the electric flux through the square?
(Hint: Think of the square as one face of a cube with edge 10cm.)

Answer
The square can be considered as one face of a cube of edge 10cm, with a centre where charge q is placed. According to Gauss's theorem for a cube, total electric flux is through all its six faces.
$\phi_{\text{Total}}=\frac{\text{q}}{\in_0}$
Hence, electric flux through one face of the cube i.e., through the square, $\phi=\frac{\phi_{\text{Total}}}{6}$
$=\frac{1}{6}\frac{\text{q}}{\in_0}$
Where,
$\in_0$ = Permittivity of free space
= 8.854 × 10-12 N-1C-1m-2
q = 10 µC = 10 × 10-6 C
$\therefore\phi=\frac{1}{6}\times\frac{10\times10^{-6}}{8.854\times10^{-12}}$
= 1.88 × 105 Nm2C-1
Therefore, electric flux through the square is 1.88 x 105 Nm2C-1.
View full question & answer
Question 133 Marks
  1. Consider an arbitrary electrostatic field configuration. A small test charge is placed at a null point (i.e., where E = 0) of the configuration. Show that the equilibrium of the test charge is necessarily unstable.
  2. Verify this result for the simple configuration of two charges of the same magnitude and sign placed a certain distance apart.
Answer
  1. Let the equilibrium of the test charge be stable. If a test charge is in equilibrium and displaced from its position in any direction, then it experiences a restorinq force towards a null point, where the electric field is zero. All the field lines near the null point are directed inwards towards the null point. There is a net inward flux of electric field through a closed surface around the null point. According to Gauss's law, the flux of electric field through a surface, which is not enclosing any charge, is zero. Hence, the equilibrium of the test charge can be stable.
  2. Two charges of same magnitude and same sign are placed at a certain distance. The mid-point of the joining line of the charges is the null point. When a test charged is displaced along the line, it experiences a restoring force. If it is displaced normal to the joining line, then the net force takes it away from the null point. Hence, the charge is unstable because stability of equilibrium requires restoring force in all directions.
View full question & answer
Question 143 Marks
  1. A conductor A with a cavity as shown in Fig. 1.36(a) is given a charge Q. Show that the entire charge must appear on the outer surface of the conductor.
  2. Another conductor B with charge q is inserted into the cavity keeping B insulated from A. Show that the total charge on the outside surface of A is Q + q [Fig. 1.36(b)].
  3. A sensitive instrument is to be shielded from the strong electrostatic fields in its environment. Suggest a possible way.

Answer
  1. Let us take a Gaussian surface which is lying completely within the conductor and enclosing the cavity. According to the Gaussian theorem, the charge enclosed by Gaussian surface must be zero as electric field vanishes everywhere inside a conductor. Thus, electric field vanishes inside the cavity. Therefore, charges which are supplied to the conductor reside on its outer surface.

  1. Let us take a Gaussian surface inside the conductor which is quite close to the cavity. According to the Gaussian theorem,

$\phi_\text{E}=\int\text{E.ds}=\frac{\text{total charge}}{\in_0}$

As the electric field inside the conductor is zero, the total charge which is enclosed by the gaussian surface must be zero. This requires, a charge of -q units to be induced on the inner surface of the hollow conductor A. But an equal and opposite charge +q units must appear on the outer surface of conductor A, so that the total charge on the outer surface of A is Q + q.

  1. Use a metallic surface to enclose the sensitive instrument completely safe and intact. Because of electrostatic shielding, the electric field inside the metal surface vanishes to zero and all charge will reside on outer surface.
View full question & answer
Question 153 Marks
Suppose that the particle in Exercise in 1.33 is an electron projected with velocity vx = 2.0 × 106 m s–1. If E between the plates separated by 0.5 cm is 9.1 × 102 N/C, where will the electron strike the upper plate? (|e|=1.6 × 10–19 C, me = 9.1 × 10–31 kg.)
Answer
Velocity of the particle, Vx = 2 .0 x 106 m/s
Separation of the two plates, d = 0.5 cm = 0.005 m
Electric field between the two plates, E = 9.1 x 102 N/C
Charge on an electron, q = 1.6 x 10-19 C
Mass of an electron, m= 9 .1 x 10-31 kg
Let the electron strike the upper plate at the end of plate L, when deflection is s. Therefore,
$\text{s}=\frac{\text{qEL}^2}{2\text{mv}^2\text{x}}$
$\text{L}=\sqrt{\frac{2\text{dmv}^2\text{x}}{\text{qE}}}$
$=\sqrt{\frac{2\times0.005\times9.1\times10^{-31}\times(2.0\times10^6)^2}{1.6\times10^{-10}\times9.1\times10^2}}$
$=\sqrt{0.025\times10^{-2}}=\sqrt{2.5\times10^{-4}}$
= 1.6 x 10-2 m
= 1.6 cm
Therefore, the electron will strike the upper plate after travelling 1.6 cm.
View full question & answer
Question 163 Marks
Which among the curves shown in Fig. 1.35 cannot possibly represent electrostatic field lines?

Answer
  1. Figure (a) cannot represent electrostatic field lines since electrostatic field lines start or end only at 90° to the surface of the conductor.
  2. Figure (b) too cannot represent electrostatic field lines as electrostatic field lines do not start from a negative charge. Electric field lines always traverse from a region of positive charge to a region of negative charge.
  3. Electrostatic field lines are represented by figure (c).
  4. Figure (d) cannot represent electrostatic field lines since no two such lines of force can intersect each other.
  5. As electrostatic field lines cannot form closed loop, therefore figure (d) also does not represent electrostatic field lines.
View full question & answer
Question 173 Marks
Careful measurement of the electric field at the surface of a black box indicates that the net outward flux through the surface of the box is 8.0 × 103 Nm2 /C.
  1. What is the net charge inside the box?
  2. If the net outward flux through the surface of the box were zero, could you conclude that there were no charges inside the box? Why or Why not?
Answer
  1. Net outward flux through the surface of the box, ($\phi$) = 8.0 x 103 Nm2/C

For a body containing net charge a, flux is given by the relation,

$\phi = \frac{\text{q}}{\in_0}$

$\in_0$ = Permittivity of free space

= 8.854 × 10-12 × 8.0 × 103

q = $\in_0\phi$

= 8.854 × 10-12 × 8.0 × 103

= 7.08 × 10-8

= 0.07 µC

Therefore, the net charge inside the box is 0.07 µC.

  1. No

Net flux piercing out through a body depends on the net charge contained in the body. If net flux is zero, then it can be inferred that net charge inside the body is zero. The body may have equal amount of positive and negative charges.

View full question & answer
Question 183 Marks
The electrostatic force on a small sphere of charge 0.4 μC due to another small sphere of charge –0.8 μC in air is 0.2 N.
  1. What is the distance between the two spheres?
  2. What is the force on the second sphere due to the first?
Answer
  1. Electrostatic force on the first sphere, F = 0.2 N 

Charge on this sphere, q1 = 0.4 µC = 0.4 × 10-6 C

Charge on the second sphere, q2 = -0.8 µC = 0.8 × 10-6 C

Electrostatic force between the spheres is given by the relation,

$\text{F}=\frac{\text{q}_1\text{q}_2}{4\pi\in_0\text{r}^2}$ And $\frac{1}{4\pi\in_0}=9\times10^{9}\text{Nm}^2\text{C}^{-2}$

Where, $\in_0\ =$ Permittivity of free space

And, $\frac{1}{4\pi\in_0} = 9\times10^9\text{Nm}^{-2}\text{C}^{-2}$

$\text{r}^2=\frac{\text{q}_1\text{q}_2}{4\pi\in_0\text{F}}$

= 144 × 10-4

r = $\sqrt{144\times10^{-4}}=0.12\text{m}$

The distance between the two spheres is 0.12m.

  1. Both the spheres attract each other with the same force. Therefore, the force on the second sphere due to the first is 0.2N.
View full question & answer
Question 193 Marks
An electric dipole with dipole moment 4 × 10-9 Cm is aligned at 30° with the direction of a uniform electric field of magnitude 5 × 104 NC-1. Calculate the magnitude of the torque acting on the dipole.
Answer
Electric dipole moment, p = 4 × 10-9 Cm
Angle made by p with a uniform electric field, θ = 30°
Electric field, E = 5 × 104 NC-1.
Torque acting on the dipole is given by the relation,
Τ = pEsinθ
= 4 × 10-9 × 5 × 10× Sin 30
= 20 × 10-5 × $\frac{1}{2}$
= 10-4 Nm
Therefore, the magnitude of the torque acting on the dipole is 10-4 Nm.
View full question & answer
Question 203 Marks
Consider the charges q, q, and –q placed at the vertices of an equilateral triangle, as shown in Fig. 1.7. What is the force on each charge?
Image
Answer
The forces acting on charge $q$ at A due to charges $q$ at and $-q$ at $C$ are $F _{12}$ along BA and $F _{13}$ along $AC$ respectively, as show1 in Fig. 1.7. By the parallelogram law, the total force $F _1$ on the charg $q$ at $A$ is given by
$F _1=F \hat{ r }_1$ where $\hat{ r }_1$ is a unit vector along BC.
The force of attraction or repulsion for each pair of charges has th same magnitude $F=\frac{q^2}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 l^2}$
The total force $F _2$ on charge $q$ at B is thus $F _2=F \hat{ r }_2$, where $\hat{ r }_2$ is unit vector along $AC$.
Similarly the total force on charge $-q$ at $C$ is $F _3=\sqrt{3} F \hat{ n }$, where $\hat{ n }$ is the unit vector along the direction bisecting the $\angle BCA$.
It is interesting to see that the sum of the forces on the three charges is zero, i.e.,
$
F _1+ F _2+ F _3=0
$
The result is not at all surprising. It follows straight from the fact that Coulomb's law is consistent with Newton's third law. The proof is left to you as an exercise.
View full question & answer
Question 213 Marks
Consider three charges $q_1, q_2, q_3$ each equal to $q$ at the vertices of an equilateral triangle of side $l$. What is the force on a charge $Q$ (with the same sign as q) placed at the centroid of the triangle, as shown in Fig. 1.6?
Image
Answer
In the given equilateral triangle $ABC$ of sides of length $l$, if we draw a perpendicular $AD$ to the side $BC$,
$AD = AC \cos 30^{\circ}=(\sqrt{3} / 2) l$ and the distance $AO$ of the centroid $O$ from $A$ is $(2 / 3) AD =(1 / \sqrt{3})$. By symmatry $AO = BO = CO$.
Thus,
Force $F _1$ on $Q$ due to charge $q$ at $A =\frac{3}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{Q q}{l^2}$ along $AO$
Force $F _2$ on $Q$ due to charge $q$ at $B =\frac{3}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{Q q}{l^2}$ along BO
Force $F _3$ on $Q$ due to charge $q$ at $C =\frac{3}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{Q q}{l^2}$ along $CO$
The resultant of forces $F _2$ and $F _3$ is $\frac{3}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{Q q}{l^2}$ along $OA$, by the parallelogram law. Therefore, the total force on $Q=\frac{3}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{Q q}{l^2}(\hat{ r }-\hat{ r })$ $=0$, where $\hat{ r }$ is the unit vector along $OA$.
It is clear also by symmetry that the three forces will sum to zero. Suppose that the resultant force was non-zero but in some direction. Consider what would happen if the system was rotated through $60^{\circ}$ about $O$.
View full question & answer
Question 223 Marks
A charged metallic sphere A is suspended by a nylon thread. Another charged metallic sphere B held by an insulating
Image
handle is brought close to A such that the distance between their centres is 10 cm, as shown in Fig. 1.4(a). The resulting repulsion of A is noted (for example, by shining a beam of light and measuring the deflection of its shadow on a screen). Spheres A and B are touched by uncharged spheres C and D respectively, as shown in Fig. 1.4(b). C and D are then removed and B is brought closer to A to a distance of 5.0 cm between their centres, as shown in Fig. 1.4(c). What is the expected repulsion of A on the basis of Coulomb’s law? Spheres A and C and spheres B and D have identical sizes. Ignore the sizes of A and B in comparison to the separation between their centres.
Answer
Let the original charge on sphere A be $q$ and that on B be $q^{\prime}$. At a distance $r$ between their centres, the magnitude of the electrostatic force on each is given by
$
F=\frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{q q^{\prime}}{r^2}
$
neglecting the sizes of spheres A and B in comparison to $r$. When an identical but uncharged sphere $C$ touches $A$, the charges redistribute on A and $C$ and, by symmetry, each sphere carries a charge q/2. Similarly, after D touches B, the redistributed charge on each is $q^{\prime} / 2$. Now, if the separation between A and B is halved, the magnitude of the electrostatic force on each is
$
F^{\prime}=\frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{(q / 2)\left(q^{\prime} / 2\right)}{(r / 2)^2}=\frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{\left(q q^{\prime}\right)}{r^2}=F
$
Thus the electrostatic force on A, due to B, remains unaltered.
View full question & answer
Question 233 Marks
The electric field components in Fig. 1.24 are $E_x=\alpha x^{1 / 2}, E_y=E_z=0$, in which $\alpha=800 N / C m ^{1 / 2}$. Calculate (a) the flux through the cube, and (b) the charge within the cube. Assume that $a=0.1 m$.
Image
Answer
(a) Since the electric field has only an $x$ component, for faces perpendicular to $x$ direction, the angle between $E$ and $\Delta S$ is $\pm \pi / 2$. Therefore, the flux $\phi= E . \Delta S$ is separately zero for each face of the cube except the two shaded ones. Now the magnitude of the electric field at the left face is
$
E_L=\alpha x^{1 / 2}=\alpha a^{1 / 2}
$
( $x=a$ at the left face).
The magnitude of electric field at the right face is
$
E_R=\alpha x^{1 / 2}=\alpha(2 a)^{1 / 2}
$
$(x=2 a$ at the right face).
The corresponding fluxes are
$
\begin{aligned}
\phi_L & = E _L \cdot \Delta S =\Delta S E _L \cdot \hat{ n }_L=E_L \Delta S \cos \theta=-E_L \Delta S , \text { since } \theta=180^{\circ} \\
& =-E_L a^2 \\
\phi_R & = E _R \cdot \Delta S =E_R \Delta S \cos \theta=E_R \Delta S , \quad \text { since } \theta=0^{\circ} \\
& =E_R a^2
\end{aligned}
$
Net flux through the cube
$
\begin{array}{l}
=\phi_R+\phi_L=E_R a^2-E_L a^2=a^2\left(E_R-E_L\right)=\alpha a^2\left[(2 a)^{1 / 2}-a^{1 / 2}\right] \\
=\alpha a^{5 / 2}(\sqrt{2}-1) \\
=800(0.1)^{5 / 2}(\sqrt{2}-1) \\
=1.05 N m ^2 C ^{-1}
\end{array}
$

(b) We can use Gauss's law to find the total charge $q$ inside the cube. We have $\phi=q / \varepsilon_0$ or $q=\phi \varepsilon_0$. Therefore,
$
q=1.05 \times 8.854 \times 10^{-12} C =9.27 \times 10^{-12} C \text {. }
$
View full question & answer
Question 243 Marks
If $10^9$ electrons move out of a body to another body every second, how much time is required to get a total charge of $1 C$ on the other body?
Answer
In one second $10^9$ electrons move out of the body. Therefore the charge given out in one second is $1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 10^9 C =1.6 \times 10^{-10} C$. The time required to accumulate a charge of $1 C$ can then be estimated to be $1 C \div\left(1.6 \times 10^{-10} C / s \right)=6.25 \times 10^9 s =6.25 \times 10^9 \div(365 \times 24 \times$ 3600) years $=198$ years. Thus to collect a charge of one coulomb, from a body from which $10^9$ electrons move out every second, we will need approximately 200 years. One coulomb is, therefore, a very large unit for many practical purposes.
It is, however, also important to know what is roughly the number of electrons contained in a piece of one cubic centimetre of a material. A cubic piece of copper of side $1 cm$ contains about $2.5 \times 10^{24}$ electrons.
View full question & answer
Question 253 Marks
A positive point charge (+ q) is kept in the vicinity of an uncharged conducting plate. Sketch electric field lines originating from the point on to the surface of the plate.
Derive the expression for the electric field at the surface of a charged conductor.
Answer

Field at the surface of a charged conductor

We have, by Gauss’s law,

$\text{E }\delta\text{ S} =\frac{|\sigma| \delta\text{ S}}{\varepsilon_{0}}$

$\therefore\text{E} = \frac{|\sigma|}{\varepsilon_{0}}.$

View full question & answer
Question 263 Marks
State Gauss's theorem in electrostatics. Apply this theorem to derive an expression for electric field intensity at a point near an infinitely long straight charged wire.
Answer
  1. Statement: Net electric flux through to a closed surface is equal to $\frac{1}{\varepsilon_\circ}$ times the total net charge enclosed within the surface.

(If the student just writes $\oint\text{E}.\text{ds} =\frac{\text{q}}{\in_\circ}$, award )

  1. Diagram:- 

  1. Derivation:- 

$\oint\text{E}.\text{ds} \int\limits_{s_1}\overline{E}.\text{d}\overline{s}_{1} + \int\limits_{s_2}\overline{E}.\text{ds}_{2} + \int\limits_{s_3}\overline{E}.\text{ds}_{3}$

$ = 0 + 0 + 2\pi\text{r}\ell$

Also, $\text{q} = \lambda$  $\ell$ (where $\lambda$  is charge per unit length)

$(\text{E}).(2\pi\text{r}\ell) = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_\circ}\lambda\ell $ OR $\text{E}2\pi\text{r}\ell\frac{\text{q}}{\varepsilon_\circ}$

$\text{E} = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_\circ\text{r}}$ OR $\text{E} = \frac{\text{q}}{2\pi\varepsilon_\circ\text{r}\ell}$.

View full question & answer
Question 273 Marks
Using Gauss’s theorem, show mathematically that for any point outside the shell, the field due to a uniformly charged thin spherical shell is the same as if the entire charge of the shell is concentrated at the centre. Why do you expect the electric field inside the shell to be zero according to this theorem?
Answer
$\phi =\oint\limits_{s}\overrightarrow{\text{E}}.\overrightarrow{\text{d}}\text{s} = \frac{\text{q}}{\varepsilon_{\circ}}$

Derivation: $\text{E}\times4\pi\text{r}^{2} =\frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_{\circ}}4\pi\text{R}^{2}$

$\therefore \text{E} = \frac{\sigma\text{R}^{2}}{\varepsilon_{\circ}\text{r}^{2}}$

where $\text{q} = 4\pi\text{R}^{2}\sigma$ is the total charge on the spherical shell. Electrostatic field is zero, since total charge inside the shell is zero or charge reside on the surface of the shell.

View full question & answer
Question 283 Marks
Using Gauss’s law in electrostatics, deduce an expression for electric field intensity due to a uniformly charged infinite plane sheet. If another identical sheet is placed parallel to it, show that there is no electric field in the region between the two sheets.
Answer

By Gauss’s law $ \oint \overrightarrow{E}.\overrightarrow{ds}=\frac{q}{\in_0}$

$\therefore{2{\text{EA}}}=\frac{\sigma{\text{A}}}{{\in_0}}$

$\therefore\text{E}=\frac{\sigma}{2\in_0}\text{ }\text{or}\frac{\sigma}{2\in_0}\text{A}$

Electric field between two identical charged sheets

$\because$  Both the sheets have same charge density, their electric fields will be equal and opposite in the region between the two sheets.

Hence the net field is zero.

Alternate Answer

$\text{E}_1=\frac{\sigma}{2\in_0}$

$\text{E}_2=-\frac{\sigma}{2\in_0}$

Resultant electric field between the plates = E1 + E2

$\frac{\sigma}{2\in_0}-\frac{\sigma}{2\in_0}=0$]

View full question & answer
Question 293 Marks
Define electric flux. Write its SI unit.
Using Gauss’s law, deduce an expression for electric field intensity due to an infinitely long straight uniformly charged wire.
Answer
The electric flux is defined as

$\phi_E=\overrightarrow{E}.\overrightarrow{A}={EA}\cos\theta$

Its S.I unit is $(Nm^{2}C^{-1})$

The Gaussian surface is cylindrical and field is radial. At the cylindrical part of the surface, cylindrical part of the surface, $ \overrightarrow{E}$ is normal to the surface at every point and its magnitude is constant (since it depends only on r). By Gauss’s theorem : $ \oint \overrightarrow{E}.{d}\overrightarrow{S}=\frac{q}{\in_0}$

$\therefore(2\pi{rl})=\frac{\lambda{l}}{\in_0}$ 

$\text{or}\text{ }\text{ } E=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\in_0r}$

View full question & answer
Question 303 Marks
  1. Define torque acting on a dipole of dipole moment $\overrightarrow{p}$ placed in a uniform electric field $\overrightarrow{\text{E}}$. Express it in the vector form and point out the direction along which it acts.
  2. What happens if the field is non-uniform?
  3. What would happen if the external field $\overrightarrow{\text{E}}$ is increasing (i) parallel to $\overrightarrow{p}$ and (ii) anti-parallel to $\overrightarrow{p}$?
Answer
  1. $\tau=pE\sin\theta\text{ };\text{ }\theta=$ angle between dipole moment($\overrightarrow{p}$) and electric field($\overrightarrow{\text{E}}$)

$\tau=\overrightarrow{p}\times\overrightarrow{\text{E}}$

Direction of torque is perpendicular to the plane containing and given by right-hand screw rule.

Alternate Answer

Direction of torque is out of the plane of the paper.

  1. If the field is non uniform the net force on the dipole will not be zero. There will be translatory motion of the dipole.
  2.  
  1. Net force will be in the direction of increasing electric field.

  1. Net force will be in the direction opposite to the increasing field. [or in the direction of decreasing field]

View full question & answer
Question 313 Marks
A charge Q is distributed uniformly over a metallic sphere of radius R. Obtain the expressions for the electric field (E) and electric potential (V) at a point 0 < x < R.
Show on a plot the variation of E and V with x for 0 < x < 2R.
Answer

By Gauss theorem

 $\oint \overrightarrow{E}.d\vec{s}=\frac{q}{E_0}$

q = 0 in interval 0 < x < R

$\Rightarrow E=0$

$E=-\frac{dv}{dr}$

$\Rightarrow V= constant=\frac{1}{4\pi E_0}\frac{Q}{R}$

View full question & answer
Question 323 Marks
A long charged cylinder of linear charge density $+\lambda_1$ is surrounded by a hollow coaxial conducting cylinder of linear charge density $-\lambda_2$. Use Gauss’s law to obtain expressions for the electric field at a point (i) in the space between the cylinders, and (ii) outside the larger cylinder.
Answer
As Gauss’s Law states:

$\oint\overrightarrow{E}.\vec{ds}=\frac{q}{\in_0}$

  1. $\oint\overrightarrow{E_1}.\vec{ds}=\frac{\lambda_1l}{\in_0}$

$\Longrightarrow\overrightarrow{E_1}=\frac{\lambda_1}{2\pi\in_0r_1}\hat{r_1}$

  1. $\oint\overrightarrow{E_2}.\vec{ds}=\frac{(\lambda_1-\lambda_2)l}{\in_0}$

$\Longrightarrow\overrightarrow{E_2}=\frac{(\lambda_1-\lambda_2)}{2\pi\in_0r_2}\hat{r_2}$

View full question & answer
Question 333 Marks
  1. Define torque acting on a dipole of dipole moment $\overrightarrow{p}$ placed in a uniform electric field $\overrightarrow{\text{E}}$. Express it in the vector form and point out the direction along which it acts
  2. What happens if the field is non-uniform?
  3. What would happen if the external field $\overrightarrow{\text{E}}$ is increasing (i) parallel to $\overrightarrow{p}$ and (ii) anti-parallel to $\overrightarrow{p}$?
Answer
  1. $\tau=pE\sin\theta\text{ };\text{ }\theta=$ angle between dipole moment($\overrightarrow{p}$) and electric field($\overrightarrow{\text{E}}$)

$\tau=\overrightarrow{p}\times\overrightarrow{\text{E}}$

Direction of torque is perpendicular to the plane containing and given by right-hand screw rule.

Alternate Answer

Direction of torque is out of the plane of the paper.

  1. If the field is non uniform the net force on the dipole will not be zero. There will be translatory motion of the dipole.
  2.  
  1. Net force will be in the direction of increasing electric field.

  1. Net force will be in the direction opposite to the increasing field. [or in the direction of decreasing field]

View full question & answer
Question 343 Marks
  1. Obtain the expression for the torque $\overrightarrow\tau$ experienced by an electric dipole of dipole moment $\overrightarrow{\text{P}}$ in a uniform electric field$\overrightarrow{\text{E}}$
  2. What will happen if the field were not uniform?
Answer
  1.  

Force on + q, $\overrightarrow{\text{F}}=q\overrightarrow{\text{E}}$

Force on - q, $\overrightarrow{\text{F}}=-q\overrightarrow{\text{E}}$

Magnitude of torque

$\tau=q\text{E}\times2a \text{ sin}\theta$

$\tau=2q\text{a}\times{\text{E}} \text{ sin}\theta$

$\overrightarrow\tau=\overrightarrow{\text{P}}\times\overrightarrow{\text{E}}$

  1. If the electric field is non uniform, the dipole experiences a translatory force as well as a torque.
View full question & answer
Question 353 Marks
A charge is distributed uniformly over a ring of radius ‘a’. Obtain an expression for the electric intensity E at a point on the axis of the ring. Hence show that for points at large distances from the ring, it behaves like a point charge.
Answer

Net Electric Field at point $\text{P} =\int^{2\pi\text{a}}_{\circ}\text{dE}\cos\theta$

dE = Electric field due to a small element having charge dq 

$ = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_\circ}\frac{\text{dq}}{\text{r}^{2}}$

Let $\lambda$ = Linear charge density

$ = \frac{\text{dq}}{\text{dl}}$

$\text{dq} = \lambda\text{dl}$

Hence $\text{E} = \int^{2\pi\text{a}}_{\circ}\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_\circ}.\frac{\lambda\text{dl}}{\text{r}^{2}}\times\frac{x}{r} , $

where $\cos\theta =\frac{\text{x}}{\text{r}}$

$ = \frac{\lambda\text{x}}{4\pi\varepsilon_\circ\text{r}^{3}}(2\pi\text{a})$

$ =\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_\circ}\frac{\text{Qx}}{(\text{x}^{2} + \text{a}^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}}$

 where total charge $\text{Q} = \lambda\times2\pi\text{a}$

At large distance i.e. x >> a

$\text{E}\simeq\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_\circ}.\frac{\text{Q}}{\text{x}^{2}}$

This is the Electric field due to a point charge at distance x.

View full question & answer
Question 363 Marks
  1. Derive the expression for the capacitance of a parallel plate area A and plate separation d.
  2. Two charged spherical conductors of radii Rand R2 when conducting wire acquire charges q1 and qrespectively. surface charge densities in terms of their radii.
Answer
  1.  

Electric field between the plates of capacitor E = $\frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_{0}} =\frac{\text{Q}}{\text{A}\varepsilon_{0}}$

$\therefore$ potential difference

$\text{V} = \text{Ed} = \frac{\text{Qd}}{\text{A}\varepsilon_{0}}$

Capacitance

$\text{C} = \frac{\text{Q}}{\text{V}} = \frac{\varepsilon_{0}\text{A}}{\text{d}}$

  1. When the two charged spherical conductors are connected by a conducting wire , they acquire the same potential

i.e $\frac{\text{Kq}_{1}}{\text{R}_{1}} = \frac{\text{Kq}_{2}}{\text{R}_{2}}\Rightarrow\frac{\text{q}_{1}}{\text{q}_{2}} = \frac{\text{R}_{1}}{\text{R}_{2}}$

Hence, ratio of surface charge densities

$\frac{\sigma_{1}}{\sigma_{2}} = \frac{\text{q}_{1}/4\pi\text{R}_{1}^{2}}{\text{q}_{2}/4\pi\text{R}_{2}^{2}}$

$ = \frac{\text{q}_{1}\text{R}_{2}^{2}}{\text{q}_{2}\text{R}_{1}^{2}}$

$ = \frac{\text{R}_{1}}{\text{R}_{2}}\times\frac{\text{R}_{2}^{2}}{\text{R}_{1}^{2}} = \frac{\text{R}_{2}}{\text{R}_{1}}.$

View full question & answer
Question 373 Marks
A capacitor of unknown capacitance is connected across a battery of V volts. The charge stored in it is 360 $\mu$C. When potential across the capacitor is reduced by 120 V, the charge stored in it becomes 120 $\mu$C.
Calculate:
  1. The potential V and the unknown capacitance C.
  2. What will be the charge stored in the capacitor, if the voltage applied had increased by 120 V?
Answer
  1. Initial voltage, V1 = V volts and charge stored, Q1 = 360 µC.

    Q1 = CV1 …(1)

    Changed potential, V2 = V − 120

    Q2 = 120 µC

    Q2 = CV2 ...(2)

    By dividing (2) from (1), we get  $\frac{\text{Q}_{1}}{\text{Q}_{2}}=\frac{\text{C}{V}_{1}}{\text{C}{V}_{2}} \Rightarrow \frac{360}{120}=\frac{\text{V}}{\text{V}-{120}}$

$\therefore {\text{C}}=\frac{\text{Q}_{1}}{\text{V}_{1}}=\frac{{360}\times{10}{^-}{^6}}{180}={2}\times{10}{^-}{^6} \text{F}={2}\mu{\text{F}}$

  1.  If the voltage applied had increased by 120 V, then $\text{V}_{3}={180}+{120}={300}\text{V}.$

Hence, charge stored in the capacitor, $\text{Q}_{3}=\text{C}\text{V}_{3}={2}\times{10}{^-}{^6}\times{300}={600}\mu\text{C}.$

View full question & answer
Question 383 Marks
A hollow cylindrical box of length 1 m and area of cross-section 25 cm2 is placed in a three dimensional coordinate system as shown in the figure. The electric field in the region is given by$\overrightarrow{\text{E}} = 50\text{x}\hat{\text{i}},$ where E is in NC–1 and x is in metres. Find

  1. Net flux through the cylinder.
  2. Charge enclosed by the cylinder.

Answer
  1.  

Given,  $\vec{E}={50}{x}\vec{i} \text{and}\bigtriangleup{s}={25}\text{C}\text{m}{^2}={25}\times{10}{^-}{^4}\text{m}{^2}$

As the electric field is only along the x-axis, so, flux will pass only through the cross-section of cylinder.

Magnitude of Electric Field at cross - section A, $\text{E}_\text{A}={50}\times{1}={50}\text{N}\text{C}{^-}{^1}$

Magnitude of Electric Field at cross - Section B, $\text{E}_\text{B}={50}\times{2}={100}\text{N}\text{C}{^-}{^1}$

The Corresponding Electric Fluxes are:

$\phi_\text{A}=\vec{\text{E}}.\bigtriangleup\vec{s}={50}\times{25}\times{10}{^-}{^4}\times\cos{180}{^0}=-{0.125}\text{N}\text{m}{^2}\text{C}{^-}{^1}$

$​​\phi_\text{B}=\vec{\text{E}}.\bigtriangleup\vec{s}={100}\times{25}\times{10}{^-}{^4}\times\cos{0}{^0}=-{0.25}\text{N}\text{m}{^2}\text{C}{^-}{^1}$

So, the net flux through the cylinder, $\phi=\phi_\text{A}+\phi_\text{B}= -{0.125} + {0.25}={0.125}\text{N}\text{m}{^2}\text{C}{^-}{^1}$

  1.  Using Gauss’s law:

 $\oint\vec{\text{E}}{d}\vec{\text{s}}=\frac{\text{q}}{\in_{0}}\Rightarrow{0.125}=\frac{\text{q}}{{8.85}\times{10}{^-}{^1}{^2}}$

$\Rightarrow\text{q}={8.85}\times{0.125}\times{10}{^-}{^1}{^2}={1.1}\times{10}{^-}{^1}{^2}\text{C}$

View full question & answer
Question 393 Marks
Using Gauss's law obtain the expression for the electric field due to a uniformly charged thin spherical shell of radius R at a point outside the shell. Draw a graph showing the variation of electric field with r, for r > R and r < R.
Answer

From Gauss's theorem, ${\phi = \oint\overrightarrow{\text{E}}}.\text{d}\overrightarrow{\text{S}} = \frac{\text{q}_{m}}{\varepsilon_{0}}$

Flux $\phi$through S'.

$\phi = \oint\limits_{s'}\overrightarrow{\text{E}}.\text{d}\overrightarrow{\text{S}} = \oint\limits_{s'}\text{EdS} = \text{E}.4\pi\text{r}^{2}$

$\Rightarrow\text{E}.4\pi\text{r}^{2} = \frac{\text{q}_{m}}{\varepsilon_{0}}\Rightarrow\text{E} = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{\text{q}_{m}}{\text{r}^{2}}$


View full question & answer
Question 403 Marks
A thin conducting spherical shell of radius R has charge Q spread uniformly over its surface. Using Gauss’s law, derive an expression for an electric field at a point outside the shell.

Draw a graph of electric field E(r) with distance r from the centre of the shell for $0\underline{<}\text{r}\underline{<}\infty.$

Answer
$\oint\overrightarrow{\text{E}}.\overrightarrow{\text{ds}} = \frac{\text{q}}{\varepsilon_\circ}$

$\text{E}\times4\pi\text{r}^{2} =\frac{\text{Q}}{\varepsilon_\circ}$

$\text{E} = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_\circ}\frac{\text{Q}}{\text{r}^{3}}$

View full question & answer
Question 413 Marks
What is electric flux? Write its S.I. units.

Using Gauss’s theorem, deduce an expression for the electric field at a point due to a uniformly charged infinite plane sheet.

Answer
Electric Flux: Total number of electric lines of force crossing a certain area normally.

Alternate Answer

The surface integral of electric field over a closed surface.

Alternate Answer

$\phi = \oint\overrightarrow{\text{E}}.\text{d}\overrightarrow{\text{s}}$

  1. S.I. Units: Nm2 /C Or V-m
  1.  

Derivation: $\phi= \oint_{s}\overrightarrow{\text{E}}.\overrightarrow{\text{ds}}= \frac{\text{q}}{\varepsilon_\circ}$

$2\text{EA} =\frac{\sigma\text{A}}{\varepsilon_\circ}$

$\therefore \text{E} =\frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_{\circ}}$

View full question & answer
Question 443 Marks
Estimate the number of electrons in 100g of water. How much is the total negative charge on these electrons?
Answer
Molecular mass of water = 18g

Number of molecules in 18g of H2O = Avogadro's number

= 6.023 × 1023

Number of electrons in 1 molecule of H2O = (2 × 1) + 8 = 10

Number of electrons in 6.023 × 1023 molecules of H2O = 6.023 × 1024

That is, number of electrons in 18g of H2O = 6.023 × 1024

So, number of electrons in 100g of H2$=\frac{6.023\times10^{24}}{18}\times100$

$=3.34\times10^{25}$

$\therefore$ Total charge $=3.34\times10^{25}\times1.6\times10^{-19}$

$=5.34\times10^6\text{C}$

View full question & answer
Question 453 Marks
It is said that any charge given to a conductor comes to its surface. Should all the protons come to the surface? Should all the electrons come to the surface? Should all the free electrons come to the surface?
Answer
Protons never take part in any electrical phenomena because they are inside the nuclei and are not able to interact easily. These are the free electrons that are responsible for all electrical phenomena. So, if a conductor is given a negative charge, the free electrons come to the surface of the conductor. If the conductor is given a positive charge, electrons move away from the surface and leave a positive charge on the surface of the conductor.
View full question & answer
Question 463 Marks
When a charged comb is brought near a small piece of paper, it attracts the piece. Does the paper become charged when the comb is brought near it?
Answer
When a charged comb is brought near a small piece of paper, it attracts the piece due to induction. There's a distribution of charges on the paper. When a charged comb is brought near the pieces of paper then an opposite charge is induced on the near end of the pieces of paper so the charged comb attracts the opposite charge on the near end of paper and similar on the farther end. The net charge on the paper remains zero. 
View full question & answer
Question 473 Marks
The kinetic energy of a charged particle decreases by 10J as it moves from a point at potential 100V to a point at potential 200V. Find the charge on the particle.
Answer
K.C. decreases by 10J.

Potential = 100v to 200v.

So, change in K.E = amount of work done

$\Rightarrow10\text{J}=(200-100)\text{v}\times\text{q}_0$

$\Rightarrow100\text{q}_0=10\text{v}$

$\Rightarrow\text{q}_0=\frac{10}{100}$

$=0.1\text{C}$

View full question & answer
Question 483 Marks
Two isolated metal spheres A and B have radii R and 2R respectively, and same charge q. Find which of the two spheres have greater energy density just outside the surface of the spheres.
Answer
Energy density,

$\text{U}=\frac{1}{2}\in_0\text{E}^2$

But, $\text{E}=\frac{\sigma}{\in_0}=\frac{\text{Q}}{\text{A}\in_0}$

$\therefore\ \text{U}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{\in_0\text{Q}^2}{\text{A}^2\in_0}\ \Rightarrow\ \text{U}=\frac{\text{Q}^2}{2\text{A}^2}$

$\Rightarrow\ \text{U}\propto\frac{1}{\text{A}^2}\ \Rightarrow\ \text{U}_\text{A}>\text{U}_\text{B}$

View full question & answer
Question 493 Marks
Two equal charges are placed at a separation of 1.0m. What should be the magnitude of the charges so that the force between them equals the weight of a 50kg person?
Answer
Let the magnitude of each charge be 

Separation between them, r = 1m

Force between them, F = 50 × 9.8 = 490N

By Coulomb's Law force,

$\text{F}=\frac{1}{4\pi\in_0}\frac{\text{q}_1\text{q}_2}{\text{r}^2}$

$\Rightarrow490=9\times10^9\times\frac{\text{q}^2}{1^2}$

$\Rightarrow\text{q}^2=54.4\times10^{-9}$

$\Rightarrow\text{q}=\sqrt{54.4\times10^{-9}}$

$=23.323\times10^{-5}\text{C}$

$\text{q}=2.3\times10^{-4}\text{C}$

View full question & answer
Question 503 Marks
A charge Q is uniformly distributed over a rod of length l. Consider a hypothetical cube of edge l with the centre of the cube at one end of the rod. Find the minimum possible flux of the electric field through the entire surface of the cube.
Answer
Given:

Total charge on the rod = Q

The length of the rod = edge of the hypothetical cube = l

Portion of the rod lying inside the cube, $\text{x}=\frac{\text{l}}2{}$

Linear charge density for the rod $=\frac{\text{Q}}{\text{l}}$ 

Using Gauss's theorem, flux through the hypothetical cube,

$\phi=\Big(\frac{\text{Q}_{\text{in}}}{\in_0}\Big),$ where Qin = charge enclosed inside the cube

Here, charge per unit length of the rod $=\frac{\text{Q}}{\text{l}}$

Charge enclosed, $\text{Q}_{\text{in}}=\frac{\text{Q}}{\text{l}}\times\frac{\text{l}}{2}=\frac{\text{Q}}{2}$

Therefore,

$\phi=\frac{\frac{\text{Q}}{2}}{\in_0}=\frac{\text{Q}}{2\in_0}$

View full question & answer